Most of us can identify a little with the obnoxious Veruca Salt from “Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory.” (The Gene
Wilder version rules!) We see something cool and we want to have it – an iPhone or the new Flip digital video recorder, or a Kindle, or a faster, better version of the computer we currently own. But we also know that for the most part, everything we buy today is likely bound for tomorrow’s landfill.
When I was a kid, in my family, cars and appliances were bought to last – and my parents meticulously maintained them to prolong their lifespans as much as possible. We didn’t waste food, we recycled everything we could, we didn’t get new clothes until we outgrew our old ones or they simply wore out, and we shared tools with neighbors. That’s why when something I have falls apart quickly, or even worse, requires an upgrade not because it’s broken but outmoded, it bugs me.
When my dad passed away 15 years ago, I gave a refrigerator (a GE product by the way) that he had owned since his bachelor days to a good friend of mine. It is now in his garage as a beer fridge. I know, it probably wastes energy sitting there humming away, but there’s something lovely about a 50+-year-old fridge.
Planned obsolescence is a term first developed in the 1920s and ‘30s when mass production of goods was becoming more fully established. It refers of course to the practice of designing a product to become obsolete or non-functional after a certain period of time, the rationale being to reduce the time period between repeat purchases. On the one hand, this can be seen as exploitative; on the other, it is a way to exist competitively in a fast-changing market – if a product lasts too long before requiring replacement the company may be slower in introducing innovative improvements, or a competitor may do so and lure customers away. Today we are used to thinking we need a new computer every two years or less – and a new mobile phone even more frequently than that.
A recent article in the Chicago Tribune was about a company that recycles old mobile phones. Here’s the big statistic from the article:
“According to industry estimates, nearly 200 million cellphones will be sold in the U.S. this year. A large number of these buyers are already wireless subscribers with handsets, so more than 100 million phones will be retired. If improperly dumped in a landfill, they can release toxic materials from their batteries, small fluorescent lights and other parts.”
The article goes on to recite lots of compelling data to show that this is an important issue that must be addressed, and it provides some great information on companies that will take care of recycling your mobile phone in a responsible manner.
That said, next time you buy something you’ve bought lots of times before, ask yourself, Is there a better way? Can I buy something that will last longer? Is there a way to responsibly dispose of this when it does finally crap out? If not, can I do without it? Remember what happened to Veruca Salt (in the Gene Wilder version of “Willy Wonka” she gets dumped down the garbage chute). I guess that’s a kind of recycling, eh?